Eric
Cantor has sent out an e-mail to his constituents; the subject line reads “I’d
like to Hear From You.” The congressman
wants “to understand where you stand
on the many issues facing our nation and how they’re impacting you and your
family.” Included is a
survey full of leading questions.
Eric
Cantor is notorious for ignoring his constituents, but people or corporations
outside of his district, however, are another
story. During the 2010 campaign, his advance staff went
so far as to have local police remove and arrest for
disorderly conduct, trespassing, and resisting arrest a Louisa, Virginia, constituent
from a campaign event at his local coffee shop—one that the constituent had
registered for. This past August, two hundred of Cantor’s constituents rented a
ballroom in the same hotel where Cantor was holding an “advisory council
meeting,” again to which he had invited constituents (via an announcement on a
Tea Party website). They had been unable to get a meeting with Cantor and were
hoping to be heard at this event. Ultimately, the
group was kicked out of the hotel where the event was
held—the hotel cited discomfort with hosting “conflicting events.”
Three
Democrats are competing for the chance to run against
Cantor this election. David Hunsicker
formerly served in the Air Force and is real estate broker from Orange County. E. Wayne Powell, also a military (army) vet is an attorney. Jim Phillips is a
former Assistant Attorney General of Virginia and a Richmond law professor. In
2010, Cantor was challenged by one Democrat and one Tea Party candidate—they
held debates which Cantor declined to take part in. Democrat Rick Waugh
won 34.1% of the vote and Floyd
Bayne 6.5%, certainly not very much, but considering Cantor’s
amassed power and that Waugh and Bayne were no-names with no national support,
it’s not too shabby, either.
Perhaps with three lining up to oppose him this year,
each with more publicity and money than 2010’s candidates, Cantor is somewhat
on the defensive and realizing that he needs to at least make a show of
engaging in the campaign. Go ahead and laugh, but a poll
done in November shows signs of vulnerability.
Furthermore, if he weren’t feeling a need to polish his image he wouldn’t have
taped this
segment with 60 Minutes where he showcased his pro-choice
wife and his affinity for rap music. Days later, during a Q & A session
after reading
to elementary students in his district, he distanced
himself from his portrayal on the news show, saying, "You never know what those kind of shows are going to do or not
do," and that the producers left out that while “the beat [in rap
music] may be okay,” the lyrics are “abhorrent.” On second thought, he doesn’t much care for rap music.
My prediction is that Cantor will still win but by a
slimmer margin than he did last election. What will matter in part is how much his
opponents are able to call his
constituents’ attention to his capitulations to outside
Big Money. For example, Cantor just seriously
weakened the soon-to-be-passed STOCK Act, an insider-trading
ban for members of Congress, by removing an
amendment which would have required “political intelligence consultants” to
disclose their activities and a proposal that enables the feds to more easily
prosecute corrupt public officials. In 2009, Cantor, an investor
in the mortgage industry, opposed a measure that
would have helped home buyers get lower interest rates and avoid foreclosure.
Perhaps if voters in the VA-07 get this message, they’ll
decide the rhymes he’s been rapping in Congress are simply too abhorrent to
continue.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.